Contrary Opinion and Australian Elections

As political risk increases in all liberal democratic countries we can expect to see the contrary opinion factor playing a greater role in evaluating risk in elections and other important events.

One example is of course Brexit, while a close call, consensus opinion was that the UK would remain. Similarly, the Australian election consensus has continuously been that the Liberal Party of Australia would prevail. However, as previously posted (16/06/16), the Australian electorate is deeply cynical of its politicians and none of the contenders for the 2016 federal election are offering a way forward.

Economic, social  and political reform is needed to set Australia on course for the next phase of its 100 year odd history. Its clear that the electorate is exhausted by the constant personality bicker of politicians and their inability to tackle the big issues. The consistent message for over a decade is that political self interest is more important than the people. Accordingly many believe the economic and social decline experienced by many Australians is set to continue.

Little has been said by politicians that offers any resonance with voters. So with this dissonance there is room for the Law of Contrary Opinion to operate. The law suggests “if everybody thinks one thing then bet the other way.” This law works well at times of extremity. For example, consensus thinking at elections, stock market highs and lows, etc, etc. Traders of financial markets use this tool when market sentiment is strongly biased.

Based on contrary opinion then, expect an upset on July 2nd with either a hung parliament or an outright win to the Australian Labor Party.